Reflections of Canada

June 30th, 2009

It’s Canada Day tomorrow, the 142 anniversary of Confederation. It’s also the 4th Canada Day in a row I will have been out of the country for (I moved to the United States in late 2005).

I always feel kind of a letdown when July 1st rolls around, since I don’t have any Canadians to celebrate with. Instead of moping with my usual quart of Labatt Bleu (yes I have found it again this year), I think I’ll share some general thoughts on my home country.

The 2 Regions of Canada
I can say that there are 2 distinct regions of Canada. Toronto, and Not Toronto. Honestly, that’s what most Canadians will tell you. People from Toronto don’t like the rest of Canada, and the rest of Canada doesn’t like people from Toronto. A fun example of this irrational hatred is in Ontario as a whole. Toronto is the capital of the province, and the GTA (Greater Toronto Area) is where most of the province’s population lives. So, it stands to reason that the Toronto area generates the most tax income for the Ontario government. But time and time again it’s obvious that Toronto doesn’t get back what they put in. Money flows out to smaller cities and rural areas. People in these areas pay higher property taxes of course, but not to the level to offset the huge difference in the cost of providing basic services such as roads and health care, where population density drops so much. So you have rural Ontarians sitting there in their Toronto-supported lifestyles complaining about how much they hate Toronto. I say, go to Moncton! (Sorry to offend anyone from Moncton, I knew someone who lived there and thought it was hell.)

My Royal Highness
Canada is a member of the British Commonwealth, in that we retained the British King or Queen as our highest head of state in exchange for the right of Parliamentary self-governance. It basically saved us from going through the hassle of a Revolutionary War, like the United States went through. But, it means we’re stuck with a Royal Family. So, I suppose I better raise my glass and toast my Royal Highness, and I will continue to do so until Queen Elizabeth II passes, Charles takes his place as king, and all of Canada collectively says “OK, this isn’t much fun any more,” and our Revolutionary War begins. I can totally see Red Green riding through the streets on a car built from gutter tubing and duct tape, shouting “The British are coming, eh?”

Non-Royal Politics
The right to self-governance had the unfortunate side-effect of politics. It’s about the same as anywhere, he said, she said, that sort of crap. My favorite is the classic ‘turn the other defensive’ argument. It’s ok to do something unethical or immoral because ‘my opponent did the same.’ Ugh, I hate that sort of thing. Canada’s Federal Conservative party has had a minority government for the past 5 years or so, which always surprised me considering how liberal Canadians tend to be. But then again, the Canadian Conservative party would, compared to American politics, be more like Democrats than Republicans so who knows. It does make me miss our good ol’ Liberal Prime Minister, Jean Chretien. He brought prosperous economic times, and laid the whoop-ass down on that French protester on Flag Day. Man I miss him! Looked like a troll but he was so damn loveable.

Je parle Francais
As France played a huge part in the colonization of Canada, they had a great part in the new country’s foundation and governance. Quebec does seem like another world though. Many people will accuse the Canadian government as being more favorable to the French than the English areas of the country, but I really think the English-speakers are totally using the French - we learn French, and then make 40% more money at our jobs because we’re bilingual. We’re just using the language for personal gain. It could be a pretty surreal Jerry Springer episode.

2 National Sports
I don’t follow sports that much, but I know enough to know that Canada has 2 national sports - hockey and curling. Curling, however will get you beat up so you don’t want to admit to liking it, you watch taped matches at 2 am when no one’s awake, while eating McCain Deep & Delicious cake (I do really miss that cake). Funny that Baseball will never be considered a serious sport in Canada, since we actually have a team that has accomplished something in recent memory. The Toronto Blue Jays won 2 world series, back-to-back, in the early 90’s. Woah, that’s recent memory? I am getting old. That’s like 15 years ago.

Well, those are my thoughts for now. I may add onto this later!

Let’s Talk Mega-Unions

June 22nd, 2009

Well, I woke up to read that the city workers in my home city of Toronto are on strike this morning. Some 30,000 unionized employees are on the picket lines, covering city-run services such as garbage collection/recycling, city daycare, park maintenance, public pools and the island ferry service.

The major breakdown for the contract negotiations was the insistence that the unions give up some concessions that they had fought for before, because the recession has brought hard times economically for the city. One of the most well-publicized items that was under negotiation was the city’s sick day banking system. City workers are entitled to 18 sick days per year, which, if not used, can be banked and partially cashed in on retirement. People were only too quick to chime in that it was an unreasonable benefit (mainly because they themselves don’t get it). Funny how those who would consider unions to be entitlement-minded would use an argument that because they don’t get something, no one else should.

But that aside, it got me thinking about the role in society of today’s mega-unions. Now I use the prefix mega- because there are really two forms of unions, regular, smaller unions who kind of fade into the background, and the mega-unions who, because of their size or the industries they represent, are in the scrutiny of the media and therefore the public.

Unions were born in the 1930’s out of a basic need - for the working man to get a fair shake. It was an attempt at bridging the gap between the working man and the company, to provide the workers with both a reasonable pay rate, and easier access to management to voice their concerns about the company and the safety of the workers. This was met with great resistance as it was seen as communism trying to break into our bastion of democratic capitalism. Many incidents of violence broke out on the picket lines between strikers and police, the military, militias, vigilantes, scabs, or just the pitchfork-wielding public. Today, the violence has certainly worn down, but the general anger towards unions persists.

I would like to ask, what roles do unions play these days? Because of the work of the unions in the 30’s, 40’s and 50’s, the working man does have a fair shake. Pay has been reasonable, the working man has access to management, and benefits abound. So why do we need unions? One would argue that the moment unions disappear, those in positions of power would seek to take away what unions fought for - fire ‘em all and rehire at half the wage - that sort of thing. So for most union members, the union needs to exist for their own security. But what does a union, who has earned their members everything that they can hope to earn, do to justify their continued existence? They can’t collect union dues and just sit around twiddling their thumbs. The answer is simple, they ask for more.

During good times for companies, unions make the argument that the workers deserve more as they have driven the company to greater success. This often works, and new benefits which would not fly in the non-union sector are added. But the reason for this might be more to prevent a strike then whether they are actually deserved benefits.

And here is the disconnect, between the working man and the management. The unions have argued that because the workers have allowed the company greater success and greater profits, they are deserving of greater benefits. But, when times are tough, as they now are, the unions make themselves out to be victims as their companies need to scale back to survive. Basic logic is that if you take something extra when times are good, you have to give it back when times aren’t. That’s called give and take, and is proving to be totally necessary for us to get through this recession.

In the end, unions certainly exist for a reason, but the fact that they exist and must justify their existence to their members means that unions will always be fighting and striking for more, even if that risks driving public opinion away, and in some cases, bringing their companies down. Simply put, it can be a bitter pill, but we all have to swallow it for our own good.

You Know What I Hate? Part 3

June 10th, 2009

You know what I hate? Oh, this is a big one. Being self employed, I work on my computer. Most of the time, I have music playing while I work. Then I’ll go to a website where some sound clip or video will load and play without me knowing. Of course, it’s often louder than my music, and so I jump out of my chair because I wasn’t expecting it.

Note to ANYONE who has a website or builds them. DO NOT have music or videos that play without approval from a visitor. It’s bad form and it royally PISSES ME OFF!!! Consider any potential business from me GONE!

You Know What I Hate? Part 2

May 27th, 2009

You know what I hate? The news. Every minute of world events is covered by at least a dozen full-time news networks. That’s at least twelve minutes of news reporting for every minute of actual events. This is insane! And you know what? People are no more informed or knowledgeable about things today than they were back when the news simply consisted of a paper in the morning and an hour’s TV in the evening.

You Know What I Hate? Part 1

May 22nd, 2009

You know what I hate? Marketing for environmentally conscious products or ideas. Just because I use a cloth bag or a biodegradable dish soap does not mean that I’m ’saving the planet.’ That’s like me giving 5 bucks to a food bank and saying that I’m ’solving world hunger.’

Wal-Mart’s Brilliant Marketing Plan?

March 29th, 2009

I read an article recently that highlighted the recent closing of some large big-box stores. The author questioned what could be done with these giant buildings when they close. They’re too big for anything other than what they were built for. They just leave a big gaping hole in a parking lot dotted with megastores.

As usual, any mention of big-box stores generates a great number of comments, many talking about how Wal-Mart-like mega-entities needed to be purged from our communities. A later comment was incredulous to these comments. “Are you kidding me? You can afford to pay for items at regular retail cost?” This comment got me thinking, and I realized that perhaps Wal-Mart is much more intelligent and dubious than we give them credit for. They might be marketing GENIUSES. To demonstrate, allow me to outline the steps of the cycle that we seem to be stuck in. Note that I mention Wal-Mart but I do mean big-box stores in general.

Step 1: The United States has a retail system that works well for the most part. Larger department stores balance smaller mom-and-pop shops.

Step 2: Wal-Marts make their appearance in communities. These stores focus on everything they can to provide rock-bottom prices to their customers, including encouraging cheaper overseas manufacturing, volume, and low-paid, non-unionized employees.

Step 3: Customers flock to Wal-Mart, because now their money can go 20-30% farther, and they can afford more than they ever could. Everyone wants more stuff. (It’s ok, everyone has good, secure jobs. Put in on a credit card!)

Step 4: Businesses who can’t lower their prices to compete without going out of business feel the strain from the loss of revenue. Some do end up going out of business. The same thing happens to local manufacturing companies as they are bypassed for cheaper overseas labor.

Step 5: The employees of the businesses in Step 4 are now losing their jobs. Some get new jobs but as the cycle continues, there are less jobs out there for them to get. Some get jobs at Wal-Mart for a lower pay, but there are still more people losing their jobs than those getting them.

Step 6: Unemployment increases as the cycle continues. People struggle to balance out, but less and less people can afford to shop at regular retail stores, so they must shop at Wal-Mart. Return to Step 4 and repeat.

So, this logic does bring up that because we supported Wal-Mart while they took money away from companies in this country and their employees, some blame falls on our shoulders for the economic collapse. If we weren’t so driven by greed and the desire to get more for less, maybe there would still be decent jobs in this country, that pay better and allow us to live reasonable lives. But because more and more people are forced to tighten their belts every day, jobs are disappearing fast and people are going broke.

And that brings me to Wal-Mart’s brilliant marketing plan. If (and that is IF) they indeed foresaw this cycle, then it would be safe to assume this - A complete economic collapse would have been the goal they were shooting for, because this would make sure that no one would have enough money to shop anywhere else. Kinda funny that they had the foresight to sell EVERYTHING you could need in their stores, from food to clothes to computers to eyeglasses.

Wal-Mart did assume one thing - that communities would support a company that did not support them back. Since it was our greed and desire for more that propped them up, and collapsed so many others, looks like we didn’t disappoint.

Wal-Mart may very well be the last one standing and they couldn’t be happier. Kinda funny that Wal-Mart is a poster-child of the free market, with a very quick rise to success and great profits. Now, many people argue that the free market can fix itself if no one does anything. The only problem is that everyone may have starved to death long before it happens.

My New Aviation Poster - Part 1

March 20th, 2009

Those who know me well also know that I am almost (but not completely) freakishly into aviation. I have been since I was young, even though I was scared shitless of flying for the first time. I have flown as much and as far as my wallet would allow, and also earned a Canadian Private Pilot’s License. Also almost died in a forced low-altitude ditching into Lake Ontario when I had an engine failure 50 feet after takeoff.

Now, for someone who is also into photography and graphic design, this also means that my aviation interests can find a home there. My photo collection is full of images of planes of all types and sizes. And, about 10 years ago, I completed my poster masterpiece. It was in honor of the World Art color schemes that British Airways introduced, where there were a couple of dozen different tails, inspired by the artwork of the countries that British Airways served.

Each tail was recreated in CorelDraw using photographs as a tracing source. I worked on it on and off for 6 months, and gave up on the project twice because of what a pain in the freaking ass it was. But I always went back and said, this would look really cool when done, sucked it up, and finally finished.

The finished result is a 5 x 2.5′ laminated poster that has hung in every home I’ve lived in for the past 10 years. It always gets attention.

British Airways Poster

Unfortunately, because this was done in an old version of CorelDraw, getting it imported into Illustrator CS3 screwed up the fonts, gradients and color. So it looks kinda crappy but you get the idea.

The World Art tails were removed from British Airways because they did not unify the airline, which is perhaps a corporate answer. I think it had more to do with BA’s embarrassment that they had spent all this time and money, and Margaret Thatcher publicly commented that she thought they were ugly. Well, yes, some of them were but she didn’t have to say it. In any case, I have my ugly tails poster to remind me of brighter days. While I may not count on Ms. Thatcher as a guest any more, it’s still a nice piece.

In any case, for years I was kicking around the idea of a follow-up poster. It couldn’t fit anywhere into my schedule when I was working full-time and while my son Sage was young, but now that he’s sleeping regularly, and I’m on a more part-time work schedule, I can finally focus a little time here and there on it.

Imagine - a poster with just about every type of commercial aircraft currently flying, each one decorated with cool and colorful liveries from airlines around the world. That would be one hell of a poster.

I’ve built about 25 out of 80 aircraft so far, some moved over from the British Airways poster with some retrofitting. Here are 6 of them, the Canadian commercial aircraft collection (still debating on whether to add the Dash 6 & 7).

bom-can-dhc

They are undecorated, as I want to have all of the aircraft built and laid out before I decide what airlines make the cut. I’ll add updates to my blog as I build new aircraft. I’ll also talk about the process of building the aircraft in vector-design programs such as Illustrator, resources for the color schemes & airline graphics, and how I plan to get everything lined up.

“Comments Welcome”

March 19th, 2009

I’m starting to take issue with all of the invitations I get to add comments to everything I read. Have you noticed this? Just about every single item on the internet seems to have a comments section these days.

Well, I do understand why it’s there. Contributions by viewers add a new dimension by opening up the possibility of dialogue. People can share their opinions and give feedback. It also means that if something such as a news item is skewed, then people can call it.

On the outset, seems like a great idea!

Then, it just got messy.

About a month ago I realized why this ‘comments welcome’ idea was a complete disaster. After logging out of my Yahoo mail account, an article caught my eye. So, I read it. Don’t really remember what the gist of the article was, so don’t ask. I think it had something to do with President Obama, he tends to stir up some real emotions in people. In any case, I thought, what the heck, I’ll make a comment. Well, I wasn’t alone…there were already over 2,400 comments.

ARE YOU KIDDING ME? 2,400+ comments for one freakin’ article? I checked back a few pages and comments were appearing on the page at the rate of 3-6 per minute. And I thought, why post anything? Within 10 minutes it will have disappeared so far back in the list that no one will ever actually read it.

Comments were being added faster than they could be read! Where is the point in this??? Not only that, but most of them were angry rants, and pissing matches between posters. And I’m sorry, but this DOES NOT enhance the internet and the flow of dialogue in any way. It was just a bunch virtual shouting matches. Pointless.

I do, however, frequent one website that does it right, the website of my hometown paper, the Toronto Star. All of the comments that appear on their website are moderated, and must be approved before being posted. They can also be removed if someone finds the message without point, or in bad taste. Comments are not allowed on articles that involve legal or criminal issues, where misinformation and hearsay can affect outcomes. There is also a point where the commenting period will close, to avoid wasting their bandwidth with thousands of posts that no one will ever read.

While of course, this doesn’t have the so-called flair of a free-for-all opinion avalanche, but at least you don’t get buried.

Perhaps the age of “comments welcome” will soon go back to the age of “who gives a rat’s ass what you think?”, but for now…

…wait for it…

…comments welcome! :)